This site has limited support for your browser. We recommend switching to Edge, Chrome, Safari, or Firefox.
YOUR EYE PENCIL FOR FREE WITH PURCHASE OF 70 €

Use code WELCOME10 for 10% off your first order.

Cart 0

Congratulations! Your order qualifies for free shipping You’re $50 away from free shipping.
No more products available for purchase

Products
Pair with
Is this a gift?
Subtotal Free
Shipping, taxes, and discount codes are calculated at checkout
Science & ingrédients

Formulating isn’t about adding more

5 min de lecture
Dans cet article ↓
A good formula is not a pile-up of actives. Role, ingredient source, dose and complementarity: what separates real formulation from a long list.
Illustration sur la formulation des compléments alimentaires
In 30 seconds
  • An impressive formula is not necessarily an intelligent one. Every active should have a role, a source and a dose we can explain.
  • Two ingredients can be complementary without being “synergistic”. Ideally, synergy requires a direct comparison of the combination with the ingredients used separately.
  • Adding an active can also make a formula worse if it displaces a useful dose, makes the routine harder to follow or exists only to add another line to the label.

There is an extremely simple way to make a supplement look impressive.

Add ingredients.

Collagen. Hyaluronic acid. Vitamin C. CoQ10. Saffron. Magnesium. A slightly unusual antioxidant. Then, while we are at it, another one.

By the end, the label looks like the guest list for a very good dinner.

But a long formula proves only one thing: that it is long.

A formula should start with a problem, not a catalogue

The first question should not be “which active is trending?”.

It should be: what are we actually trying to do?

Hydration? Structure? Nutritional intake? Ease of use? Several coherent goals in the same formula?

Only then do the ingredients come in.

Why this one?What precise role does this ingredient play?
Why this source?What origin, form, process and documentation?
Why this dose?Is it consistent with the intended role and available evidence?
Why with the others?Does it complete the formula, or simply tell the same story again?

Complementarity is not the same as synergy

“Synergy” is a wonderful word. Two actives go into a capsule and suddenly 1 + 1 is supposed to equal 3.

Scientifically, we need to be a little more demanding.

Two ingredients are complementary when they have different but coherent roles within the same objective.

To demonstrate genuine synergy, ideally we would compare:

What seems logicalA + B have different roles

A good reason to test the combination.

What demonstrates synergyA + B performs better than A and B alone

You need a protocol designed to show it.

Our vocabulary

We prefer to talk about complementarity when the biology makes sense, and reserve the word synergy for cases where the combination itself has genuinely been tested.

Collagen + vitamin C: the perfect example

The combination has a real rationale. Vitamin C contributes to normal collagen formation for the normal function of skin, under the relevant regulatory conditions.

Collagen, meanwhile, is a different material, digested into peptides and amino acids.

The two can therefore quite reasonably have a place together.

But a 2014 trial comparing collagen alone, collagen + vitamin C, vitamin C alone and control found no significant additional benefit from adding vitamin C on the skin parameters studied.

Vitamin C retains its physiological relevance. It is simply that this trial does not demonstrate that the combination creates a superior cosmetic effect.

Collagen + hyaluronic acid: an even clearer example

On paper, it is almost irresistible. Collagen contributes to the structure of the extracellular matrix. Hyaluronic acid contributes, among other things, to its water-rich environment.

In 2024, a trial compared a collagen + vitamin C formula with the same formula plus added hyaluronic acid.

Both active formulas produced changes in certain parameters, but adding hyaluronic acid did not demonstrate a significant additional benefit under the conditions of the study.

Again, this does not mean “the combination is useless”. It means “the superiority of the combination was not demonstrated here”.

The problem with decorative doses

Every capsule has a physical size. Unfortunately, marketing has not yet managed to negotiate that limit with geometry.

The more ingredients you add, the more you have to arbitrate the available space.

Sometimes you end up with amounts large enough to put the ingredient name on the label, but too far from the doses actually studied to support the same story.

An active included “just to be there” does not make a formula more premium.

It simply takes up space.

Real sophistication is often in what you decide not to include

A short formula can require more work than a formula with fifteen actives.

You have to choose the source. Check stability. Fit in the dose. Think about tolerance. Limit the number of capsules. And, above all, accept removing an appealing ingredient that is not useful enough.

Do we know why it is there?An identifiable function, not just a reputation.
Is it the right source?The generic ingredient name is not always enough.
Is the dose defensible?Not merely visible on the label.
Does it do something the others do not?If not, watch for redundancy.
What does the formula lose if we remove it?If the answer is “a line of marketing copy”, the question is almost settled.

At Eclo, that is exactly the trade-off between Ressource and Régénère

Ressource™ and Régénère™ are not simply two more-or-less lengthy lists of actives.

Ressource includes 200 mg of hyaluronic acid supplied by ExceptionHYAL® Star, 30 mg of Céramosides™, 56.25 mg of elemental magnesium via TRAACS® Albion® bisglycinate, saffron and vitamins, among other ingredients.

Régénère follows a different architecture, including 300 mg of Reggenerate™, 150 mg of SkinAx²™, 30 mg of CoQ10, magnesium bisglycinate and saffron.

The interesting point is therefore not to count the ingredients. It is to understand why the two compositions are different.

A formula is not more intelligent because it contains more. It is more intelligent when every ingredient has earned its place.
The Eclo method

A formula should be explainable line by line.

Role, source, dose, complementarity, tolerance: if we cannot defend an active with anything other than its name, it probably has not finished its job interview.

Compare the formulas

Sources

European Commission, Regulation (EU) No 432/2012.
View the regulation

Choi S.Y. et al. (2014). Effects of collagen tripeptide supplement on skin properties: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy.
PubMed, PMID 24131075

Žmitek K. et al. (2024). The Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Collagen and Vitamin C and Their Combination with Hyaluronic Acid on Skin Density, Texture and Other Parameters: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients.
PubMed, PMID 38931263

Tout le Journal